Skip to main content
Business profile photo for Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP

Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP

Management

Michael S. Linscott

Managing Partner

Business profile photo for Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP

Contact Information

About

Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP is a full-service Oklahoma law firm founded in 1896 with offices in Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The firm provides high-quality legal solutions across multiple practice areas and industries, with particular depth in media and First Amendment law, including counseling and defense on defamation, privacy, libel, slander, invasion of privacy, and related issues for publishers, broadcasters, authors, and the Oklahoma Press Association.

Why we like Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP

Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, LLP earns its place among top Invasion of Privacy Attorney options in Oklahoma City through unmatched depth in media and First Amendment law, defending publishers, broadcasters, and journalists against libel, slander, defamation, false light, and invasion of privacy claims. Founded in 1896, the firm brings over a century of experience, longstanding client relationships, and high-profile results including U.S. Supreme Court-affirmed victories, while attorneys earn consistent recognition in Chambers USA and Best Lawyers. Proactive services such as pre-publication reviews and representation of the Oklahoma Press Association, combined with a collaborative full-service platform and Meritas global reach, distinguish it by preventing problems and delivering creative, client-first solutions for local to national matters.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Specialized expertise in media law with successful defenses of invasion of privacy, defamation, libel, slander, and First Amendment claims for major publishers, broadcasters, and journalists, including cases affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Founded in 1896 as one of Oklahoma's oldest law firms, offering deep historical experience, multi-generational client relationships, and continuity through economic cycles.

Cons

  • As a mid-sized regional firm, it may offer fewer specialized resources or bandwidth than the largest national firms for highly complex, multi-state or international privacy disputes outside core media work.
  • Strongest privacy capabilities center on media, publishing, and First Amendment matters, which could mean comparatively less emphasis on purely individual or non-media consumer invasion of privacy cases.

Review Scores

Yelp5.0

Map